1993 Ap Us History Dbq Essay Example

1993 Ap Us History Dbq Essay Example 1993 Ap Us History Dbq Essay 1993 Ap Us History Dbq Essay Essay Topic: Us History During the 17th century there were many colonies settled in the New World. One thing most of these colonies had in common is the fact that almost all of them were settled by the English. If one were to focus mostly on the New England and Chesapeake colonies, one would find that although they were settled by similar people, they ended up splitting for very different reasons. The New England colonies were searching for religious freedom from the Church of England, whereas the Chesapeake colonies were striving for economic growth. The New England colonies consisted of the settlements of Massachusetts Bay Colony, Connecticut Colony, Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations and Province of New Hampshire. Most, if not all, of these colonies were mainly settled by religious motivation. They did not want to be told by what means they could or could not worship, that was the reason they left England in the first place. Now in this new world they were being given the same rules. They wanted to control their cities by the rules of God that they believed. They wanted to elect their own faithful minister to make the laws and divide up their real estate (Doc D). They also wanted to follow John Winthrop’s idea of a model puritan city, the â€Å"City on a Hill† (Doc A). The first name on a list of emigrants coming to the New England was Joseph Hull of Somerset, he was a Minister. His name was the very first name on the list, therefore his name was the most prominent name on the list, and he was a minister (Doc B). This shows that the New England colonist truly respected members of the clergy. The Chesapeake colonies were settled for very different reasons. They were mainly settled for economic development and prosperity. In many of the Chesapeake colonies, such as Connecticut, the prices and wages were set and agreed upon by the court. They did not have any religious figures decided laws or actions to carry them out. Many of the tradesmen, as well as the laborers, in Connecticut were told to â€Å"consider the religious ends of their calling† and to â€Å"[not] live in the practice of that crying sin of oppression, but avoid it† (Doc E). This means that they were told to end their religious practices but to also avoid the life of sin. By doing this, they made room for more work which would in turn help the settlement prosper economically. There were also many plantations in the Chesapeake colonies. These plantations grew tobacco which inclined many workers to uphold the demand. This helped to draw in many English workers, as well as African Slaves, which ended up helping the economic growth of the colony overall. Lastly, both settlements were colonized by two different types of people, with extremely different motives. The Chesapeake colonies, such as Virginia and Maryland, were colonized by single men looking for the potential development of economic growth, and the ability to make a profit. Whereas the New England Colonies, such as Rhode Island, were colonized by family men looking for a place where their family could be free from religious oppression. Virginia was colonized by John Smith, a single man who saw the opportunity to make some money and did everything in his power to keep the colony alive in order to do so. Maryland was colonized by Lord Baltimore, another single man who granted real estate to his friends which paved the way for economic growth. Although the New England colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were both settled by Englishmen, they split for very different, but equally legitimate reasons. The New England colonies were searching for religious freedom from the Church of England, whereas the Chesapeake colonies were striving for economic growth.

Medical Billing and Coding Essays

Medical Billing and Coding Essays Medical Billing and Coding Essay Medical Billing and Coding Essay Outline for Writing a Research Paper I. Introduction- begin with Thesis Statement: In one clear sentence state the focus of your paper. A. Key points (have at least three, but no more than five) 1. state each main point that you’ll be making in the paper 2. main point 3. main point 4. main point 5. main point Body of paper- outline the topic sentence and supporting research for each point you’ll be covering in the paper, beginning with point #1 stated in the introduction. A. Point 1- topic sentence idea 1. research concept a. supporting idea(s) b. connect to next concept 2. research concept a. supporting idea(s) b. onnect to next concept 3. research concept a. supporting idea(s) b. connect to next topic idea B. Point 2- topic sentence idea 1. research concept a. supporting idea(s) b. connect to next concept 2. research concept CONTINUE FORMAT 3. â€Å" â€Å" C. Point 3- topic sentence idea and CONTINUE FORMAT D. Point 4- topic sentence idea and CONTINUE FORMAT E. Point 5- topic sentence idea and CONTINUE FORMAT 1. 2. 3. after last point is made and supported, create a transition to summary and conclusion Summary paragraph- create a key summary sentence that declares a wrap-up of concepts to begin this paragraph A. Follow the summary sentence with clear sentences that summarize each of the main ideas that have been discussed in the body of the paper 1. summary of point 1 2. summary of point 2 3. summary of point 3 4. summary of point 4 5. summary of point 5 Conclusion- transition to the ending of your paper and final thoughts in a paragraph Reference page in alphabetical order by last name (see APA format online and note examples from Reference section in back of textbook, and remember to cite all of your references in the body of your text following a summary concept or quote) II. III. IV. V.

Family Law has Evolved to Suit Modern Society Essay

Family Law has Evolved to Suit Modern Society - Essay Example However, the Law Commission’s paper recommending reformations that would govern the distribution of property between cohabitants upon the breakup of the relationship3 demonstrates that Family Law in England and Wales has still further to evolve before it can be consistent with modern society. The Law Commission’s paper identifies a crucial inconsistency between British Family law and modern society. The reality is families are formed without the benefit of a solemnized marriage in modern society, particularly between same sex partners. These families start out like any other family intending to make their lives together indefinitely and by making this commitment they raise children together and purchase property together. In other words, in modern society the structure of the family has changed dramatically.4 The introduction of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 grants same sex couples with the facilities to establish a partnership that is similar to a civil partnership an d confers upon the partners specific rights and responsibilities that are commonly granted to married couples.5 However, there is no right to claim financial/spousal support upon the breakdown on a civil partnership.6 Beyond the 2004 Act, unmarried couples remain at a disadvantage in terms of settling property once the relationship comes to an end. This reality has led the Law Commission to refer to the concept of common law marriage as a â€Å"myth†.7 As Baroness Ruth Deech explains, the idea that there is a family institution in England and Wales referred to as â€Å"common law marriage† is â€Å"erroneous†.8 The judiciary does not have the authority to settle property or the rights of couples who have lived together for any period of time and have decided to end their relationship. The only recourse of cohabiting couples ending a relationship is to seek civil remedies relative to claiming property through litigation.9 For unwed couples who live together all q uestions relative to finances and property must be resolved by reference to the applicable property and trusts laws.10 It is unfortunate that unmarried couples are denied the opportunity to resolve the financial issues arising out of the breakdown of their cohabitation when modern society demands that they do. Samantha Singer explains that public opinion is on the side of granting unmarried cohabitees the same property rights as married couples. For instance, British Social Attitudes Survey conducted in 2006 revealed that most members of the public are of the view that â€Å"cohabitants should have access to financial relief on relationship breakdown†.11 A more recent study on unmarried cohabitees in 2007/2008 revealed that 74% of the respondents supported the idea of unmarried couples having access to marital property settlement laws upon the breakdown of their relationship.12 The consequences of the denial of matrimonial property settlement laws are particularly difficult f or the cohabitee who depended on the financial support of the other cohabitee. The Family law applicable to married couples certainly recognizes the potential for hardship on the dependent spouse. For instance, Section 25A(2) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 provides that the court is required to determine whether or not an order for spousal support is necessary and in doing so, the court must determine: Whether it would be appropriate to require those payments to be made†¦